#TweetDebate of the week!
What do girl/women really mean when they say ‘I Love You’ ?
Update on #GirlSaysILoveYou and #WomanSaysILoveYou will be posted next week:
#TweetDebate of the week!
What do girl/women really mean when they say ‘I Love You’ ?
Update on #GirlSaysILoveYou and #WomanSaysILoveYou will be posted next week:
Debate Topic: Can Social Media protest turn into a riot?
Side A – No, it is social awareness
Side B – Yes, we should be prepared
Hashtag – #SMNP (Social Media in Nepal)
Debate room – #SMNp
PDF version of the debate – TweetDebate – #smnp
Background
Social Media like Twitter and Facebook play a great role in disseminating information. These media had been used in Egypt to make the protest successful.
Various Nepali groups in Twitter and Facebook have formed for various social cause and they have done some successful street protests based on online meets. Basically, these protests are done for “good cause”, with “good intentions”.
But, are there any possibility that some organization with huge resources mobilizes the crowd in wrong direction? Can, some governments or people be mis-leaded in social media? If they can, how can the community deal with it?
Egypt Revolution 2011
London Riot – ” the government, police and intelligence services were also looking at whether there should be limits on the use of social media sites such as Twitter and Facebook or services such as BlackBerry Messenger to spread organised disorder, and whether to turn off social networks or stop people texting during times of social unrest.”
Topic – Smoking ban in Nepal (#SmokeBan)
To summarize today’s debate, most of the participants agreed that – Everybody is free to smoke, as long as others’ freedom of not being exposed to smoke is not compromised.
PDF screenshot of the debate – #SmokeBan_1#SmokeBan_2
Points raised by the participants:
@nabinkm The new bill bans smoking in all *enclosed* public places including government offices, schools, hospitals and restaurants.
@Lohsirk – धुम्रपान गर्ने साथीहरु, नगर म भन्दिन, तर भर्खर धुम्रपान गरेर नेपालका सार्वजनिक यातायातमा (कोचम्कोच हुने ठाँउ) यात्रा नगरीदिनु होला
@biso_baral चुरोट खान नपाईने ठाउमा N0 SM0KING को चिन्ह राखियोस
@xKhurapati मलाई सबैको कुरो चित्त बुझो तर सबैले चुरोट खानेले नाकैमा आएर धुवाँ फाल्छन भन्ने बुझ्या रहेछन त्यो कुरो चित्त बुझेन :
@biso_baral smoking in public is illegal but mind it most of the song in your ipod is illegal too
@udayaghi तिम्रो(हाम्रो)तराई तिर नि ब्रो कानुन होइन चेतना को खाचो छ
@meaastha Society acepts dat adults can decid 2 harm demselvs so long as dey dont harm others.Harm urself smokers,we won’t pay for harmin us!
@amritnn आफू खाउ, पिय या चुरोटको गुच्चै खेल तर अरुलाई असर नगर । यही सत्य सही र संयम् निष्कर्ष होला हैन ?
@anupdgn Smoking is your choice. Don’t make others suffer.
Just like you should drink responsibly, you should smoke responsibly too.
@aakarpost गाउँका भट्टि छापा मार्नजाँदा,भट्टिवालहरु उफ्रन्थे,सक्नेभए,वियर फ्याक्ट्रि बन्द गरेर देखा’न,केलाई हाम्रो रक्सि देखि सहँदैनौ!त्यस्तै
@nepaldiary Like other countries govt should Declare Smoking Zone ! so If U want , u can smoke there !
@merobabu I may not agree on banning smoking completely. It could be regulated. There are also other things which are hazardous to health.
@UjjwalAcharya Even if the #smokeban decreases smoking by one percent, it’s good because smokers/non-smokers all agree, smoking is bad.
@meaastha I remember if there was someone smoking in public bus how I used to tell the person off! smoking in public is just intolerable!
@WebJSunil Well done govt! A much needed discipline wrt public smokin.At least now I can question ppl,a private choice sudnt b done in public
@udayaghi के नियम हो बाबै, रौसि जहाँ तह खान पाउने जाबो चुरोट माथि एस्तो दुस्मनी – कि यो नियम दारु को नसा मा बनाको त होइन ?
(more…)
UPDATE
The debate pdf – Code of Ethics – #blogCoE
Original post (before debate)
In the #tweetdebate #7 we discussed whether a blogger is a journalist or not.
Now, the issue is raised again with a proposal of a new “Code of Ethics” for bloggers. It is told that 10 bloggers have signed the document in an event organized by Equal Access. The response to the ”Code of Ethics” among various bloggers was mixed and hence this debate.
Side A - I will sign the Code of Ethics in the current form
Side B - I will not sign the Code of Ethics in the current form
The previous debates used to be more like a discussion rather than a debate. From this debate onwards we will make it an actual debate.
The participants will need to be on side A or B. But, they are free to change sides at any time during the debate.
Every participants should take the position and will need to say at the end if they change sides.
CODE OF ETHICS FOR BLOGGERS (Signed on July 27, 2011)
As a blogger, I would honestly:
- Be fair on what I write in my blog
- Write things that I believe to be truth
- Specify my source of information – credit to offline sources and link to online sources
- Specify clearly the use of any unconfirmed fact or information
- Avoid conflict of interest – clearly disclose my position including job, financial interest, affiliation and relationship if they related to the post OR maintain an detailed About Me page
- Clearly differentiate between advertisements and blog content
- Disclose clearly if an entry is posted sponsored or as advertisement or after accepting a payment or goods to write it
- Admit and correct mistakes as soon as possible but only with strikethrough or editorial notes
- Allow comments to engage audience, allow different opinions and clearly state my moderation policy if any
- Show compassion for human being – be sensitive writing about or using photos of victims
- Promote freedom of speech
As a blogger, I wouldn’t intentionally:
- Completely rewrite or delete an entry
- Threaten people and institution using the blog for personal benefits
- Write anything undermining nationality, national security, religious harmony and social order
- Give space to pornography, hate speech and crude content
- Publish personal and confidential information of people collected during their visit to my blog
- Spam, spread malware and viruses and engage in criminal activities
- Plagiarize – copy and paste from other sources
- Disclose the source of primary information without source’s consent
Nepali version of the Code of Ethics : Nepali version is removed as it was an unofficial translation. Please refer link to Hamro Blog in the link list below for the unofficial Nepali version.
#Tweetdebate is restarted and will be held on every Friday at 10PM Nepali Time.
The topic of today’s July 22nd’s discussion was #NRNworld – Should Nepali in Nepal should be concerned about NRN?
Here is the pdf version of the debate if you have missed: tweetdebat-#nrnworld
Thanking all the participants, here is the summary of the discussion:
Summary
The discussion was focused on:
Who are the NRNs?
NRN website defines:
Non-Resident Nepali (NRN) refers to Nepalis irrespective of their nationality (citizenship) living outside of Nepal. NRNA came into existence at the first Non- Resident Nepali Conference held on 11-14 October 2003.

@anupdgn; As per residential status, NRN is a person if the person doesn’t fulfill both of the condition. 1)He is in Nepal for >=182 days in Previous year. 2) The person is in Nepal for >=60 days in Previous year AND has been in Nepal for >=365 days during 4 PY immed. preceeding relevant PY
Today, the website tweetchat.com was behaving oddly and hence, some of the users couldn’t participate in the discussion. We have to have more than one such sites
PDF snapshot of the debate (Read bottom Up) – TweetChat – #npFlag
Participant List and Selected Quotes from the debate (at the end of the post)
*** Original Proposal ***
Debate topic proposed by @swpch, Swapnil Acharya
Was concerned by the use of National flag by the NepalUnites and other ppl (yesterday’s airport protest). it’s wrong.
Let’s discuss: what it wrong and what is right when National flag is concerned ?
For example, can a person say: “As a proud patriotic Nepali, I will fly my flag, wear it or display it in any manner I see fit.” ?
Issues:
(photo source)
Refer :
Flag policies in other countries:
Today is the last day of the Constitution Assembly(CA). The 601 member team hadn’t been able to prepare constitution of Nepal in time and hence was extended for one year. That one year is ending today at 12:00AM.
The constitution document is not prepared yet – in the extended 1 year, there were only 7 meetings of the CA, spending some one and half hours in 365 days (95 minutes to be exact).
The constitution is not prepared and it is not likely to be prepared in some hours so the CA will be extended for sure. Let’s discuss on what should be the future strategy of Nepali people and the internet youths in Facebook and Twitter.
Let’s talk about TODAY!
Debate details:
A discussion with hash tag #CA28Ma was going on for the whole day. So, today’s debate was shifted to the CA28May room.
Topic of today’s tweetdebate is a revisit to the changes after the 1990s.
Topic proposed by @ushaft to discuss on the positive and negative aspects of changes in Nepal after 1990s.
Update after debate
Today’s debate was more of a discussion than a debate. The two-hour discussion is a window to see Nepal through the youth in Twitter.
The transcript of the debate in pdf format (read from bottom up) tweetdebate – #np90
Although the air was full of pessimism, many of the youth were optimistic on the future of Nepal.
Some of the positive development after 1990 (BS 2046)
Some of the negative developments after 1990 (BS 2046)
Some other thoughts expressed during the discussion (unedited) :
Shared link – http://theweek.myrepublica.com/details.php?news_id=31484Reference
UPDATE (After the completion of #tweetdebate)
The transcript of the debate in pdf can be downloaded here (read bottom-up) – TweetChat – #blogPCN
The conclusion of the debate:
Some random quotes from the #tweetdebate:
****
ORIGINAL (PRE-DEBATE POST)
In request of some of the blogger friends a out-of-schedule debate is proposed to be organized on May 10, 2011 (Tuesday) from 10 PM to 12 PM Nepal time.
The context and details of debate/discussion is as follows:
Press Council under the complaints of Binod Chaudhary of the Chaudhary Group (CG), wrote a letter to a blog, Mysansar.com to clarify about a blog post.
In response Mysansar.com replied with it’s views in the matter. Read the full story here.
The episode signifies that the Government regularity body has recognized a blog as a product of journalist. The question arise:
The Press Council Act, and the Code of Conduct that PCN were formulated long before the existence of blogs. Hence, the government doesn’t have any official policies to deal with blogs.
Today’s topic was selected in a haste as there were not any suggestion (except for a
Today’s hash tag was #npbraindrain
The transcript of the debate TweetChat – #npbraindrain (pdf, read from the last page towards the top)
The debate was done in – http://tweetchat.com/room/npbraindrain
@friendycalls suggested to shorten the hash-tag in future debates. (#npbraindrain was 13 character long – causing toll in 140 character allowed in each tweet)
Some random points from the debate:
Suggestion by @prajinm to reduce brain drain in Nepal:
Another school of thoughts (it is no brain drain)
It is natural for people to migrate from one place to another – since ancient times. Modern world is quite different and more accessible making it easier to transform the world into a small place where cities or countries does not matter much.
Confining talents, skills and knowledge within a geographic boundary doesn’t have a future.
Recent Comments